1
================================================================================

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549



                                    FORM 8-K
                                 CURRENT REPORT


     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934




                        DATE OF REPORT:  AUGUST 20, 1996
                       (Date of earliest event reported)



                             SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



 MARYLAND                  COMMISSION FILE NO. 1-12616                38-2730780
(State of incorporation)                                 (IRS Employer I.D. No.)



                             31700 MIDDLEBELT ROAD
                                   SUITE 145
                       FARMINGTON HILLS, MICHIGAN  48334
                    (Address of principal executive offices)



                                 (810) 932-3100
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

================================================================================
   2
ITEM 2.         OTHER EVENTS. 

        In a letter dated August 20, 1996, Sun Communities, Inc. ("Sun") has
made a written proposal to the board of directors of Chateau Properties, Inc.
("Chateau") to merge Chateau and CP Limited Partnership ("CP") into Sun and Sun
Communities Operating Limited Partnership in a tax-free transaction in which
Chateau holders would receive 0.892 shares of Sun's common stock and/or
operating partnership units for each of Chateau's shares and/or operating
partnership units. 


                                   SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized. 

                                        SUN COMMUNITIES, INC.,
                                        a Maryland corporation 


Date:   August 22, 1996                 By: /s/ Jeffrey P. Jorissen 
                                            --------------------------------
                                                Jeffrey P. Jorissen, Senior Vice
                                                President, Treasurer, Chief 
                                                Financial Officer, and Secretary




                                    - 2 -
   3


                                EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit Filed Number Description Herewith - ------- ----------- -------- 99.1 Press release announcing the registrant's proposal for a merger with Chateau Properties, Inc. and CP Limited Partnership X 99.2 Letter proposing a merger from the registrant to the board of directors of Chateau Properties, Inc. X
- 3 -
   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1


PRESS RELEASE

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:

        AT SUN COMMUNITIES:
        Gary A. Shiffman, Chief Executive Officer
        (810) 932-3100
        Jeffrey P. Jorissen, Chief Financial Officer
        (810) 932-3100

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 21, 1996

            SUN COMMUNITIES CONFIRMS PROPOSAL FOR STRATEGIC MERGER
                           WITH CHATEAU PROPERTIES

Sun Communities, Inc. (NYSE:SUI) confirmed today that it has made a written
proposal to the board of directors of Chateau Properties, Inc. (NYSE:CPJ) to
merge Chateau and CP Limited Partnership into Sun and Sun Communities Operating
Limited Partnership in a tax-free transaction in which Chateau holders would
receive 0.892 shares of Sun's common stock and/or operating partnership units
for each of Chateau's shares and/or operating partnership units.  Based upon
Sun's August 20, 1996 closing price of $28.00 per share, Sun's offer is valued
at $25.00 per share of Chateau.  Sun also indicated that it would be willing to
evaluate alternative forms of consideration to the extent necessary to satisfy
the objectives of both Sun's and Chateau's holders.

In a letter dated August 20, 1996 to Chateau's board of directors, Sun detailed
the enhanced strategic and financial benefits to Chateau's holders in a merger
with Sun as compared to a proposal made by Manufactured Home Communities, Inc.
on August 19, 1996 or Chateau's proposed merger with ROC Communities, Inc.

Gary A. Shiffman, Sun's Chief Executive Officer, commented on Sun's proposal,
stating "The overlap between Chateau's and Sun's portfolios and corporate
cultures is the strongest in the manufactured housing REIT sector.  A combined
Chateau and Sun would succeed Sun as the largest community owner in the U.S.
and would become the undisputed, dominant player in the industry."  Sun and
Chateau had previously discussed a strategic merger in late 1995.

Relative to the MHC and ROC proposals, the benefits of a merger with Sun
include the larger size and greater operating efficiencies of a Sun-Chateau
combination, immediate and long-term accretion to both companies' funds from
operations per share, increased financial flexibility and improved liquidity,
as well as improved growth opportunities based on Sun's superior track record
in completing acquisitions and community expansions.  According to the Sun
letter, Chateau management's experience in new community development
complements Sun's proven experience in the acquisition and expansion arena.


                                     MORE


   2
Sun, which is the largest owner of manufactured housing communities in the
United States, would have an equity market capitalization of approximately $850
million and a total market capitalization of approximately $1.2 billion when
combined with Chateau.  With 126 properties containing over 48,000 manufactured
housing sites, Sun and Chateau would together own more sites than either ROC
and Chateau or MHC and Chateau.

In its letter, Sun asserted that its portfolio and Chateau's are the most
compatible among the manufactured housing community REITs in terms of
geographic concentration and asset quality.  For example, the geographic
overlap between the Sun and Chateau portfolios is significantly greater than
that with ROC or MHC, creating larger economies of scale and a smoother
transition process to common management.  Approximately 65% and 80% of Sun's
and Chateau's properties, respectively, are located in their two primary
markets, Michigan and Florida.  Moreover, both companies are headquartered in
Michigan, leading to additional overhead efficiencies.

Sun pointed out in its letter that it has consistently achieved the highest
operating margins in the peer group of companies as measured by earnings before
depreciation, amortization, interest and taxes as a percentage of revenues. 
While Chateau's operating margins rank second to Sun's, ROC and MHC operate at
the two lowest margins in the peer group.  "Because of our geographic overlap
with Chateau and strong operating margins," commented Mr. Shiffman, "we believe
we can create tangible operating efficiencies while enhancing our dominant
position in our key markets."

Unlike both ROC and MHC, Sun has achieved investment-grade senior unsecured
credit ratings from the major rating agencies.  Like Chateau, which also
possesses investment-grade credit ratings, the vast majority of Sun's assets
remain unencumbered by secured debt, maximizing financial flexibility as
compared to the MHC or ROC proposals.

Mr. Shiffman summarized Sun's proposal by stating "We believe this proposal is
of substantial immediate and longer term benefit to both of our respective
shareholder groups.  We are prepared to move rapidly toward a definitive merger
agreement and feel confident that the transaction can be consummated by year
end."

Sun has retained Lehman Brothers as its financial advisor and Jaffe, Raitt,
Heuer & Weiss and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom as its legal advisors. 
Sun's proposal is subject to customary conditions, including the termination of 
Chateau's existing merger agreement with ROC, rejection of the MHC proposal and
the execution of a definitive merger agreement.  Sun's offer will be made only
via an effective prospectus and joint proxy statement which will be filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission following the execution of a definitive
merger agreement.




                                     ###
   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                       [SUN COMMUNITIES, INC. LETTERHEAD]


August 20, 1996



Board of Directors                                      VIA HAND DELIVERY 
Attn: Mr. John A. Boll, Chairman 
Chateau Properties
19500 Hall Road 
Clinton Township, MI 48038

Dear John:

Although I would have preferred to meet with you in person, I am forwarding
this proposal in writing both to underscore the seriousness of our purpose and
to permit your board of directors to deal with what I anticipate are
contractual restrictions in your previously announced merger agreement with ROC
Communities. As I discussed with you this afternoon by telephone, and in view
of Manufactured Home Communities' unsolicited proposal to acquire Chateau, Sun
Communities would like to propose a better alternative for Chateau and its
shareholders than either the MHC offer or the proposed merger with ROC
Communities. 

As you know, this is not an impromptu proposal: during the fall of 1995, I met
with you and Mr. Kellogg on several occasions to discuss a strategic merger of
Chateau Properties and Sun Communities. While we believed then, and continue to
strongly believe, that a Chateau-Sun merger has extraordinary strategic and
financial benefits, we had not intended to preempt your existing merger
agreement with ROC. However, in view of the MHC proposal, we are compelled to
present you and your shareholders with our proposal. 

Quite simply, in a strategic merger, Chateau and Sun would together become the
clearly dominant force in our industry. Such an alliance presents Chateau with
unmatched strategic and financial benefits, including the combined entity's
larger size, operating efficiencies and economies of scale, immediate and
long-term accretion to both companies' funds from operations per share,
improved depth and breadth of management, enhanced liquidity, increased
financial flexibility and improved access to potential acquisition, expansion
and development opportunities. 

As a result, we are prepared to offer Sun shares and/or operating partnership
units to all of Chateau's public shareholders and operating partnership
unitholders, respectively, at a 0.892 exchange ratio in a tax-free strategic
merger. Based upon Sun's August 19, 1996 closing price of $28.00 per share, our
offer is valued at $25.00 per Chateau share. This represents a significant
premium to the value your shareholders will receive in the proposed ROC merger,
as well as a superior strategic fit for the reasons discussed below. While this
would be our preferred form of consideration, we have the financial resources,
flexibility and willingness to work with you to structure a transaction which
satisfies the objectives of all of your equity holders. 

Unlike MHC's proposal, our offer is not bifurcated to coerce shareholders who
wish to avoid a taxable event into accepting a "low ball" stock offer. While we
appreciate and admire your 



                                  Page 1 of 3
   2
commitment to the ROC transaction, we believe that the market reaction to MHC's
unsolicited proposal will make it increasingly difficult, if not impossible, to
consummate the ROC merger, even pursuant to amended terms.

We and our financial and legal advisors (Lehman Brothers, Jaffe, Raitt, Heuer &
Weiss and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom) are prepared to meet with you
immediately and move rapidly toward completing this strategic merger.  We
believe strongly in the merits of a merger between our two companies, which are
more compatible in nearly every respect than Chateau is to MHC or ROC.  We think
the following benefits are compelling relative to either the MHC or ROC
proposals.

- -       GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES

        Acquisitions:  Since our IPO, we have acquired 48 high-quality
        communities containing approximately 19,500 sites at attractive
        capitalization rates, outpacing both MHC and ROC.  As a result, we
        believe that Chateau's access to profitable acquisitions would be
        improved in a potential merger with Sun.  Even more importantly, in a
        merger with Sun, Chateau can take advantage of our significant
        experience in successfully integrating multiple new community
        operations, such as our recent acquisition of Aspen Enterprises'
        25-community portfolio.  We think our ability to smoothly assimilate
        large portfolios stands in marked contrast to certain of our
        competitors.

        Expansions:  Our successful community expansion program added over 300
        sites in 1995 and is scheduled to complete nearly 700 sites in 1996.
        Our supply of potential expansion sites for 1997 and beyond remains over
        2,200 at 16 communities, where the average existing occupancy is 97%
        (leading to built-in demand for expansions).  In comparison, MHC and ROC
        completed 225 and 51 expansion sites in 1995, respectively.  As a
        result, we believe that Chateau's expansion opportunities would be
        enhanced in a merger with Sun.

        Development:  We have commenced a 150 acres "greenfield" development in
        our Austin, Texas market, one of the country's strongest markets.  We
        are also in the advanced stages of purchasing several parcels of zoned
        land in our Michigan markets for new development.  With Chateau's
        management capabilities in the development area, we believe that the
        combined companies could successfully operate a profitable development
        business.

- -       OPERATING PERFORMANCE:  Chateau and Sun possess the strongest operating
        margins in the manufactured housing community sector.  Specifically,
        Sun's ratio of EBITDA to revenues for 1995 was 66%, compared to 61% for
        Chateau.  MHC and ROC, however, operate at substantially lower margins
        of approximately 55% each.  As a result, in a merger with Sun, Chateau
        could further strengthen its operating profitability, as opposed to
        diluting the same in a merger with MHC or ROC.

- -       GEOGRAPHIC CONCENTRATION:  Chateau and Sun enjoy the best geographical
        overlap in the sector, leading to a smooth integration process and
        meaningful general and administrative savings, particularly relative to
        a merger with MHC or ROC, whose portfolios are scattered nationwide.
        Chateau's and Sun's two primary markets, Florida and Michigan, represent
        approximately 80% and 65% of our respective portfolios.


                                  Page 2 of 3
   3
- -       Size: In a Chateau-Sun merger, the combined entity would be larger than
        in a combination with MHC or ROC.  Chateau-Sun would have an
        equity market capitalization of approximately $850 million, a total
        capitalization of $1.2 billion, 126 properties and 48,000 sites,
        providing the combined company with improved opportunities for
        operating efficiencies, liquidity, growth and a lower cost of capital.

- -       Financial Flexibility: Like Chateau, Sun has investment-grade senior
        unsecured credit ratings from the major rating agencies. 
        Similarly to Chateau, we have always pursued a policy of lower
        leverage, and only six of our 77 communities are subject to secured
        debt.  We also have the full $75 million facility amount available on
        our unsecured revolving credit facility, which is supported by five
        major financial institutions.  Unlike Chateau and Sun, neither MHC nor
        ROC have been able to obtain investment-grade ratings.

- -       Access to Capital: Sun has successfully completed two follow-on equity
        offerings since its IPO, each at successively higher prices per
        share.  In addition, we have successfully accessed the commercial
        mortgage-backed securities, unsecured corporate bond and unsecured
        credit facility markets.  MHC and ROC have each completed just one
        follow-on equity offering since their initial public offerings.

- -       Liquidity: Both of our respective shareholder groups would achieve
        enhanced liquidity in a merger.  In 1996 year-to-date, Sun's
        average daily trading volume is over 40,000 shares; Chateau's is
        approximately 25,000 shares.  MHC's and ROC's average volumes are
        approximately 37,500 shares and 26,800 shares per day, respectively.

While this is not a complete discussion of all of the benefits of a strategic
merger of our two companies, we think a strategic combination between Chateau
and Sun is demonstrably better for your holders and creates exciting strategic
and financial opportunities.  While we do not wish to interfere with your
agreement with ROC in any inappropriate way, as noted above we would expect
that your agreement would contain a "fiduciary out" provision which would
permit you to consider our more attractive offer.

Under our proposal and consistent with a strategic merger, we would expect that
the combined entity's board of directors and senior management team would be
comprised of a fair representation from each of our companies.  Of course, our
proposal is subject to customary conditions, including the termination of your
existing merger agreement with ROC, the rejection of the MHC proposal and the
execution of a definitive merger agreement with us.

We believe this proposal is of substantial immediate and longer term benefit to
both of our respective shareholder groups.  We and our advisors are prepared to
move rapidly toward a definitive merger agreement on a basis that is fair to
all of your equity holders, and believe a year-end 1996 closing is imminently
achievable.  We would like to schedule a meeting as soon as possible to discuss
our proposal in greater detail - please contact me at (810) 932-3100 at your
earliest convenience.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Gary A. Shiffman

Gary A. Shiffman
President



                                 Page 3 of 3